Massey Ferguson MF 4225 (A) or New Holland TL 70 (A)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the MF 4225 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the TL 70 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The New Holland TL 70 (A) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 16% (390 kg / 860 lb) more three-point lift.
- The Massey Ferguson 4225 (A) suits road haulage better on this data: 25% (1,300 kg / 2,866 lb) more maximum permissible mass.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | MF 4225 (A) | TL 70 (A) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 47.8 kW (64.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 4225” | 47.8 kW (64.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TL70” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MF 4225 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the TL 70 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the MF 4225 (A) and the TL 70 (A). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the MF 4225 (A) and the TL 70 (A). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | 44.5 L/min (11.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TL70” | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the MF 4225 (A). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,450 kg (5,401 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 4225” | 2,840 kg (6,261 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TL70” | AheadThe New Holland TL 70 (A) has 16% more lift (390 kg / 860 lb) than the Massey Ferguson 4225 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,490 kg (7,694 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 4225” | 4,150 kg (9,149 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TL70” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The New Holland TL 70 (A) is 19% heavier (660 kg / 1,455 lb) than the Massey Ferguson 4225 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 6,500 kg (14,330 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 4225” | 5,200 kg (11,464 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TL70” | AheadThe Massey Ferguson 4225 (A) has 25% higher maximum permissible mass (1,300 kg / 2,866 lb) than the New Holland TL 70 (A) (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12 to 18Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 4225” | 20 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TL70” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MF 4225 (A) and the TL 70 (A). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 4225” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TL70” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 4225” | 540/540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TL70” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TL70” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the MF 4225 (A). |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 4225” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TL70” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1997–2001 | 1998–2004 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The New Holland TL 70 (A) has 16% more lift (390 kg / 860 lb) than the Massey Ferguson 4225 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The New Holland TL 70 (A) is 19% heavier (660 kg / 1,455 lb) than the Massey Ferguson 4225 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Massey Ferguson 4225 (A) has 25% higher maximum permissible mass (1,300 kg / 2,866 lb) than the New Holland TL 70 (A) (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MF 4225 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the TL 70 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources