Massey Ferguson MF 3690 (A) or New Holland 8770 A?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the MF 3690 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8770 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The New Holland 8770A suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 38% (2,060 kg / 4,542 lb) more three-point lift.
  • The New Holland 8770A suits road haulage better on this data: 43% (12.0 km/h / 7.5 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Massey Ferguson MF 3690 (A) and New Holland 8770 A, with the call on each
QuestionMF 3690 (A)8770 ACall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?139.8 kW (187.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3690”139.7 kW (187.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 8770 A”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MF 3690 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8770 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the MF 3690 (A) and the 8770 A.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the MF 3690 (A) and the 8770 A.
Which pumps more oil for implements?—126.1 L/min (33.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 8770 A”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the MF 3690 (A).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?5,420 kg (11,949 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3690”7,480 kg (16,491 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 8770 A”AheadThe New Holland 8770A has 38% more lift (2,060 kg / 4,542 lb) than the Massey Ferguson 3690 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?6,720 kg (14,815 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3690”8,748 kg (19,286 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 8770 A”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The New Holland 8770A is 30% heavier (2,028 kg / 4,471 lb) than the Massey Ferguson 3690 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?9,000 kg (19,842 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3690”—No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 8770 A.
Which has the wider choice of gears?16 to 32Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3690”18 to 36Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 8770 A”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MF 3690 (A) and the 8770 A.
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 28 km/h (17.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3690”40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 8770 A”AheadThe New Holland 8770A has 43% more top speed (12.0 km/h / 7.5 mph) than the Massey Ferguson 3690 (A) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3690”1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 8770 A”AheadThe Massey Ferguson 3690 (A) offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the New Holland 8770A does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?——No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the MF 3690 (A) and the 8770 A.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3690”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 8770 A”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1990–19951993–2002EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The New Holland 8770A has 38% more lift (2,060 kg / 4,542 lb) than the Massey Ferguson 3690 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The New Holland 8770A is 30% heavier (2,028 kg / 4,471 lb) than the Massey Ferguson 3690 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The New Holland 8770A has 43% more top speed (12.0 km/h / 7.5 mph) than the Massey Ferguson 3690 (A) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The Massey Ferguson 3690 (A) offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the New Holland 8770A does not (as stated by the sources).
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MF 3690 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8770 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources