Massey Ferguson MF 3680 vs SAME Rubin 180

10 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1989–1990

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

2000–2004

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the MF 3680 and the Rubin 180 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

10 material differences · 5 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Massey Ferguson MF 3680 and SAME Rubin 180, field by field
Field	MF 3680	Rubin 180	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	177.7 hp	177.6 hp	—
Engine declared	Valmet 612 DS	SAME 1000.6 WTI-3 V	differs
Displacement declared	7.37 L	6.00 L	+23% MF 3680
Maximum torque declared	476 lb·ft · 645 N·m	553 lb·ft · 750 N·m	+16% Rubin 180
Transmission
Top speed declared	18.6–24.9 mph · 30–40 km/h	24.9 mph · 40 km/h	differs
Clutch declared	pedal operated dry air cooled double clutch	Hydraulically operated wet multi-disc clutch with eight discs	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared	14.9 gpm · 56.3 L/min	—	—
Pressure declared	—	2,176 psi · 150 bar	—
Three-point lift at ends declared	13,360 lb · 6,060 kg	22,046 lb · 10,000 kg	+65% Rubin 180
Rear PTO speeds declared	540/1000 rpm	540/1000 rpm	—
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	12,785 lb · 5,799 kg	15,653 lb · 7,100 kg	+22% Rubin 180
Wheelbase declared	115.7 in · 2,940 mm	112.2 in · 2,850 mm	—
Length declared	203.3 in · 5,165 mm	191.4 in · 4,861 mm	+6% MF 3680
Width declared	94.1 in · 2,391 mm	95.5 in · 2,426 mm	—
Height declared	113.8 in · 2,891 mm	116.9 in · 2,970 mm	—
Ground clearance declared	17.0 in · 433 mm	23.4 in · 594 mm	+37% Rubin 180
Fuel tank declared	274.7–332.9 qt · 260.0–315.0 L	422.7 qt · 400.0 L	differs

Source

Source