Massey Ferguson MF 3670 (A) or Renault 180-94 TZ?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the MF 3670 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 180-94 TZ has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Renault 180-94 TZ suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 72% (4,620 kg / 10,185 lb) more three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Massey Ferguson MF 3670 (A) and Renault 180-94 TZ, with the call on each
QuestionMF 3670 (A)180-94 TZCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?125.1 kW (167.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3670”125.1 kW (167.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 180-94 TZ R3862”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MF 3670 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 180-94 TZ has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the MF 3670 (A) and the 180-94 TZ.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the MF 3670 (A) and the 180-94 TZ.
Which pumps more oil for implements?59.9 L/min (15.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 180-94 TZ R3862”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the MF 3670 (A).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?6,400 kg (14,110 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3670”11,020 kg (24,295 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 180-94 TZ R3862”AheadThe Renault 180-94 TZ has 72% more lift (4,620 kg / 10,185 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 3670 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?6,610 kg (14,573 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3670”6,237 kg (13,750 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 180-94 TZ R3862”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?9,750 kg (21,495 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 180-94 TZ R3862”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the MF 3670 (A).
Which has the wider choice of gears?16 to 32Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3670”27Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 180-94 TZ R3862”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MF 3670 (A) and the 180-94 TZ.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3670”40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 180-94 TZ R3862”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3670”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 180-94 TZ R3862”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 180-94 TZ R3862”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the MF 3670 (A).
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3670”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 180-94 TZ R3862”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1990–19951991–1997EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Renault 180-94 TZ has 72% more lift (4,620 kg / 10,185 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 3670 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MF 3670 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 180-94 TZ has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources