Massey Ferguson MF 3655 (A) or WHITE 2-155?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the MF 3655 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2-155 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Massey Ferguson MF 3655 (A) and WHITE 2-155, with the call on each
QuestionMF 3655 (A)2-155Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?114.1 kW (153.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3655”115.5 kW (154.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-155”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MF 3655 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2-155 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the MF 3655 (A) and the 2-155.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the MF 3655 (A) and the 2-155.
Which pumps more oil for implements?50.6 L/min (13.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3655”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 2-155.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?6,400 kg (14,110 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3655”2,903 kg (6,400 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-155”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the MF 3655 (A): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3655”); the 2-155: lift 610 mm behind the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-155”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?5,360 kg (11,817 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3655”7,552 kg (16,649 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-155”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The WHITE 2-155 is 41% heavier (2,192 kg / 4,833 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 3655 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?9,000 kg (19,842 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3655”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 2-155.
Which has the wider choice of gears?16 to 32Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3655”18Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-155”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MF 3655 (A) and the 2-155.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3655”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-155”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3655”1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “White 2-155”AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 3655 (A) offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the WHITE 2-155 does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3655”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 2-155.
Which drives on both axles?2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3655”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “White 2-155”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1990–19951976–1982Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Massey Ferguson MF 3655 (A) is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The WHITE 2-155 is 41% heavier (2,192 kg / 4,833 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 3655 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Massey Ferguson MF 3655 (A) offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the WHITE 2-155 does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The Massey Ferguson MF 3655 (A) is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MF 3655 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2-155 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the MF 3655 (A): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3655”); the 2-155: lift 610 mm behind the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-155”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources