Massey Ferguson MF 3655 (A) or Renault Ares 715 RZ?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the MF 3655 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Ares 715 RZ has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Renault Ares 715 RZ suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 137% (69.4 L/min / 18.3 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 81% (5,160 kg / 11,376 lb) more three-point lift.
  • The Renault Ares 715 RZ suits road haulage better on this data: 33% (3,000 kg / 6,614 lb) more maximum permissible mass.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Massey Ferguson MF 3655 (A) and Renault Ares 715 RZ, with the call on each
QuestionMF 3655 (A)Ares 715 RZCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?114.1 kW (153.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3655”114.8 kW (153.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 715 RZ”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MF 3655 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Ares 715 RZ has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the MF 3655 (A) and the Ares 715 RZ.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the MF 3655 (A) and the Ares 715 RZ.
Which pumps more oil for implements?50.6 L/min (13.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3655”120.0 L/min (31.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 715 RZ”AheadThe Renault Ares 715 RZ has 137% more hydraulic flow (69.4 L/min / 18.3 gpm) than the Massey Ferguson MF 3655 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?6,400 kg (14,110 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3655”11,560 kg (25,485 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 715 RZ”AheadThe Renault Ares 715 RZ has 81% more lift (5,160 kg / 11,376 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 3655 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?5,360 kg (11,817 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3655”7,380 kg (16,270 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 715 RZ”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault Ares 715 RZ is 38% heavier (2,020 kg / 4,453 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 3655 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?9,000 kg (19,842 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3655”12,000 kg (26,455 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 715 RZ”AheadThe Renault Ares 715 RZ has 33% higher maximum permissible mass (3,000 kg / 6,614 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 3655 (A) (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
Which has the wider choice of gears?16 to 32Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3655”32Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 715 RZ”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MF 3655 (A) and the Ares 715 RZ.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3655”40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 715 RZ”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3655”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 715 RZ”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3655”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Ares 715 RZ.
Which drives on both axles?2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3655”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 715 RZ”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1990–19952000–2002Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault Ares 715 RZ is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Renault Ares 715 RZ has 137% more hydraulic flow (69.4 L/min / 18.3 gpm) than the Massey Ferguson MF 3655 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault Ares 715 RZ has 81% more lift (5,160 kg / 11,376 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 3655 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault Ares 715 RZ is 38% heavier (2,020 kg / 4,453 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 3655 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault Ares 715 RZ has 33% higher maximum permissible mass (3,000 kg / 6,614 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 3655 (A) (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault Ares 715 RZ is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MF 3655 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Ares 715 RZ has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources