Massey Ferguson MF 3655 (A) or New Holland TM 155 (Traktorenlexikon)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the MF 3655 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the TM 155 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The New Holland TM 155 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 141% (71.1 L/min / 18.8 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Massey Ferguson MF 3655 (A) and New Holland TM 155 (Traktorenlexikon), with the call on each
QuestionMF 3655 (A)TM 155Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?114.1 kW (153.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3655”114 kW (153 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM 155”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MF 3655 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the TM 155 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the MF 3655 (A) and the TM 155.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the MF 3655 (A) and the TM 155.
Which pumps more oil for implements?50.6 L/min (13.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3655”121.7 L/min (32.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM 155”AheadThe New Holland TM 155 has 141% more hydraulic flow (71.1 L/min / 18.8 gpm) than the Massey Ferguson MF 3655 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?6,400 kg (14,110 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3655”6,395 kg (14,099 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM 155”EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which is heavier, for traction?5,360 kg (11,817 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3655”5,860 kg (12,919 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM 155”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?9,000 kg (19,842 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3655”9,000 kg (19,842 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM 155”EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which has the wider choice of gears?16 to 32Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3655”18 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM 155”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MF 3655 (A) and the TM 155.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3655”40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM 155”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3655”540/540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM 155”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3655”independentTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM 155”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3655”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM 155”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1990–19952002–2007Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The New Holland TM 155 is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The New Holland TM 155 has 141% more hydraulic flow (71.1 L/min / 18.8 gpm) than the Massey Ferguson MF 3655 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The New Holland TM 155 is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MF 3655 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the TM 155 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources