Massey Ferguson MF 3645 (A) or WHITE 145?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the MF 3645 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 145 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Massey Ferguson 3645 (A) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 94% (3,069 kg / 6,766 lb) more three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “similar machines”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Massey Ferguson MF 3645 (A) and WHITE 145, with the call on each
QuestionMF 3645 (A)145Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?104.5 kW (140.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3645”103.7 kW (139.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “White 145”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MF 3645 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 145 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the MF 3645 (A) and the 145.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the MF 3645 (A) and the 145.
Which pumps more oil for implements?——No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the MF 3645 (A) and the 145.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?6,340 kg (13,977 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3645”3,271 kg (7,211 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “White 145”AheadThe Massey Ferguson 3645 (A) has 94% more lift (3,069 kg / 6,766 lb) than the WHITE 145 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?5,180 kg (11,420 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3645”5,557 kg (12,251 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “White 145”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?——No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the MF 3645 (A) and the 145.
Which has the wider choice of gears?16 to 32Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3645”18Traktorenlexikon, “White 145”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MF 3645 (A) and the 145.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3645”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “White 145”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3645”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “White 145”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3645”—No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 145.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3645”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “White 145”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1990–19951990–1992EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Massey Ferguson 3645 (A) has 94% more lift (3,069 kg / 6,766 lb) than the WHITE 145 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MF 3645 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 145 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources