Massey Ferguson MF 3630 or Renault Ares 656 RZ?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Renault Ares 656 RZ: three-point lift. It is also ahead on forward gears.

  • The Renault Ares 656 RZ suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 41% (2,500 kg / 5,512 lb) more three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Massey Ferguson MF 3630 and Renault Ares 656 RZ, with the call on each
QuestionMF 3630Ares 656 RZCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?85.5 kW (114.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3630”85.2 kW (114.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 656 RZ”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the MF 3630 and the Ares 656 RZ.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the MF 3630 and the Ares 656 RZ.
Which pumps more oil for implements?No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the MF 3630 and the Ares 656 RZ.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?6,140 kg (13,536 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3630”8,640 kg (19,048 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 656 RZ”AheadThe Renault Ares 656 RZ has 41% more lift (2,500 kg / 5,512 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 3630 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?5,405 kg (11,916 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3630”5,995 kg (13,217 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 656 RZ”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault Ares 656 RZ is 11% heavier (590 kg / 1,301 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 3630 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?9,250 kg (20,393 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 656 RZ”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the MF 3630.
Which has the wider choice of gears?16Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3630”32Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 656 RZ”AheadThe Renault Ares 656 RZ has 100% more forward gears (16 gears) than the Massey Ferguson MF 3630 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MF 3630 and the Ares 656 RZ.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3630”40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 656 RZ”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3630”540/1000/540E/1000E rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 656 RZ”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3630”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 656 RZ”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3630”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 656 RZ”; OECD test report 2107, 2004EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1987–19902002–2005Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault Ares 656 RZ is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Renault Ares 656 RZ has 41% more lift (2,500 kg / 5,512 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 3630 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault Ares 656 RZ is 11% heavier (590 kg / 1,301 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 3630 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault Ares 656 RZ has 100% more forward gears (16 gears) than the Massey Ferguson MF 3630 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault Ares 656 RZ is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources