Massey Ferguson MF 363 (A) vs Renault Ceres 65/II

12 material differences

Tractor one

1987–1994

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1994–1998

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the MF 363 (A) and the Ceres 65/II → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

12 material differences · 2 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Massey Ferguson MF 363 (A) and Renault Ceres 65/II, field by field
Field	MF 363 (A)	Ceres 65/II	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	58 hp	54.3 hp	+6% MF 363 (A)
Engine declared	Perkins T 3.152-4 Turbo	JOHN DEERE 4039 DRT 65	differs
Displacement declared	2.50 L	2.94 L	+18% Ceres 65/II
Maximum torque declared	156 lb·ft · 212 N·m	134 lb·ft · 182 N·m	+16% MF 363 (A)
Transmission
Top speed declared	18.6 mph · 30 km/h	18.6–24.9 mph · 30–40 km/h	differs
Clutch declared	Dry and air-cooled double clutch	Dry LuK double clutch	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Hydraulic centre declared	Open centre	—	—
Hydraulic control declared	—	Constant flow	—
Pump flow declared	—	13.8 gpm · 52.3 L/min	—
Pressure declared	2,756 psi · 190 bar	—	—
Three-point lift at ends declared	5,291 lb · 2,400 kg	6,327 lb · 2,870 kg	+20% Ceres 65/II
Rear PTO speeds declared	540/1000 rpm	540/1000 rpm	—
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	5,291 lb · 2,400 kg	6,305 lb · 2,860 kg	+19% Ceres 65/II
Maximum permissible mass declared	—	11,244 lb · 5,100 kg	—
Wheelbase declared	83.7 in · 2,126 mm	89.7 in · 2,279 mm	+7% Ceres 65/II
Length declared	139.4 in · 3,540 mm	148.5 in · 3,771 mm	+7% Ceres 65/II
Width declared	75.8 in · 1,925 mm	73.9 in · 1,878 mm	—
Height declared	88.2 in · 2,240 mm	96.3 in · 2,445 mm	+9% Ceres 65/II
Ground clearance declared	19.3 in · 490 mm	15.4 in · 390 mm	+26% MF 363 (A)
Turning radius, braked declared	11.7 ft · 3.57 m	—	—
Fuel tank declared	90.9 qt · 86.0 L	121.5 qt · 115.0 L	+34% Ceres 65/II

Source

Source