Massey Ferguson MF 362/II or VOLVO-BM-VALMET 305 (305/4)?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Massey Ferguson MF 362/II: three-point lift.

  • The Massey Ferguson MF 362/II suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 61% (1,096 kg / 2,416 lb) more three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Massey Ferguson MF 362/II and VOLVO-BM-VALMET 305 (305/4), with the call on each
QuestionMF 362/II305 (305/4)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?33.2 kW (44.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 362/II”33.0 kW (44.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo 305”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the MF 362/II and the 305 (305/4).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the MF 362/II and the 305 (305/4).
Which pumps more oil for implements?36.0 L/min (9.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 362/II”35.6 L/min (9.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo 305”EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,891 kg (6,373 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 362/II”1,795 kg (3,957 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo 305”AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 362/II has 61% more lift (1,096 kg / 2,416 lb) than the VOLVO-BM-VALMET 305 (305/4) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?2,750 kg (6,063 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 362/II”2,710 kg (5,975 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo 305”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the MF 362/II and the 305 (305/4).
Which has the wider choice of gears?12 to 18Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 362/II”8 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo 305”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MF 362/II and the 305 (305/4).
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 362/II”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo 305”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/540E rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 362/II”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Volvo 305”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 362/II”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Volvo 305”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 362/II”2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Volvo 305”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1992–19971985Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Massey Ferguson MF 362/II is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Massey Ferguson MF 362/II has 61% more lift (1,096 kg / 2,416 lb) than the VOLVO-BM-VALMET 305 (305/4) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Massey Ferguson MF 362/II is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources