Massey Ferguson MF 340 (A) or New Holland 3435 (A)?

Which should you choose?

On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level. On features, the New Holland 3435 (A) is ahead on forward gears.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Massey Ferguson MF 340 (A) and New Holland 3435 (A), with the call on each
QuestionMF 340 (A)3435 (A)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?27.97 kW (37.51 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 340”28.0 kW (37.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 3435”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the MF 340 (A) and the 3435 (A).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the MF 340 (A) and the 3435 (A).
Which pumps more oil for implements?19.5 L/min (5.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 340”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 3435 (A).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,145 kg (4,729 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 340”2,125 kg (4,685 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 3435”EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,360 kg (5,203 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 340”1,960 kg (4,321 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 3435”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Massey Ferguson MF 340 (A) is 20% heavier (400 kg / 882 lb) than the New Holland 3435 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?3,850 kg (8,488 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 3435”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the MF 340 (A).
Which has the wider choice of gears?8Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 340”12 to 20Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 3435”AheadThe New Holland 3435 (A) has 50% more forward gears (4 gears) than the Massey Ferguson MF 340 (A) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?YesTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 3435”No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MF 340 (A).
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 340”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 3435”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/540E rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 340”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 3435”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 3435”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the MF 340 (A).
Which drives on both axles?2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 340”2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 3435”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1988–19941996–1999Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The New Holland 3435 (A) is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Massey Ferguson MF 340 (A) is 20% heavier (400 kg / 882 lb) than the New Holland 3435 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The New Holland 3435 (A) has 50% more forward gears (4 gears) than the Massey Ferguson MF 340 (A) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The New Holland 3435 (A) is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources