Massey Ferguson MF 3075 (A) or Renault 113-14 TX?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Massey Ferguson MF 3075 (A): hydraulic flow and three-point lift. It is also ahead on forward gears.
- The Massey Ferguson MF 3075 (A) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 19% (8.1 L/min / 2.1 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 11% (500 kg / 1,102 lb) more three-point lift.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | MF 3075 (A) | 113-14 TX | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 64.2 kW (86.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3075” | 63.8 kW (85.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 113-14 TX R7922” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the MF 3075 (A) and the 113-14 TX. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the MF 3075 (A) and the 113-14 TX. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 49.9 L/min (13.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3075” | 41.8 L/min (11.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 113-14 TX R7922” | AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 3075 (A) has 19% more hydraulic flow (8.1 L/min / 2.1 gpm) than the Renault 113-14 TX (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 5,000 kg (11,023 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3075” | 4,500 kg (9,921 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 113-14 TX R7922” | AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 3075 (A) has 11% more lift (500 kg / 1,102 lb) than the Renault 113-14 TX (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 4,415 kg (9,733 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3075” | 5,220 kg (11,508 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 113-14 TX R7922” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault 113-14 TX is 18% heavier (805 kg / 1,775 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 3075 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the MF 3075 (A) and the 113-14 TX. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 32Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3075” | 12Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 113-14 TX R7922” | AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 3075 (A) has 167% more forward gears (20 gears) than the Renault 113-14 TX (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MF 3075 (A) and the 113-14 TX. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3075” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 113-14 TX R7922” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3075” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 113-14 TX R7922” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3075” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 113-14 TX. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3075” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 113-14 TX R7922” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1993–1995 | 1981–1986 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Massey Ferguson MF 3075 (A) is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Massey Ferguson MF 3075 (A) has 19% more hydraulic flow (8.1 L/min / 2.1 gpm) than the Renault 113-14 TX (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Massey Ferguson MF 3075 (A) has 11% more lift (500 kg / 1,102 lb) than the Renault 113-14 TX (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Renault 113-14 TX is 18% heavier (805 kg / 1,775 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 3075 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Massey Ferguson MF 3075 (A) has 167% more forward gears (20 gears) than the Renault 113-14 TX (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The Massey Ferguson MF 3075 (A) is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources