Massey Ferguson MF 2775 or Schlüter Euro Trac 1900/2000 LS?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the MF 2775 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Euro Trac 1900/2000 LS has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Schlüter Euro Trac 1900/2000 LS suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: 14% (862 kg / 1,900 lb) heavier and four-wheel drive.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | MF 2775 | Euro Trac 1900/2000 LS | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 139.7 kW (187.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2775” | 140 kW (188 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Euro Trac 1900/2000 LS” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MF 2775 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Euro Trac 1900/2000 LS has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the MF 2775 and the Euro Trac 1900/2000 LS. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the MF 2775 and the Euro Trac 1900/2000 LS. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 55.0 L/min (14.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2775” | 54.9 L/min (14.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Euro Trac 1900/2000 LS” | EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | — | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the MF 2775 and the Euro Trac 1900/2000 LS. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 6,038 kg (13,312 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2775” | 6,900 kg (15,212 lb) to 7,100 kg (15,653 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Euro Trac 1900/2000 LS” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Schlüter Euro Trac 1900/2000 LS is 14% heavier (862 kg / 1,900 lb) than the Massey Ferguson 2775 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the MF 2775 and the Euro Trac 1900/2000 LS. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2775” | 24Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Euro Trac 1900/2000 LS” | AheadThe Schlüter Euro Trac 1900/2000 LS has 200% more forward gears (16 gears) than the Massey Ferguson 2775 (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MF 2775 and the Euro Trac 1900/2000 LS. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 35.5 km/h (22.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2775” | 34.5 km/h (21.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Euro Trac 1900/2000 LS” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2775” | 540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Euro Trac 1900/2000 LS” | AheadThe Schlüter Euro Trac 1900/2000 LS offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the Massey Ferguson 2775 does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the MF 2775 and the Euro Trac 1900/2000 LS. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2775” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Euro Trac 1900/2000 LS” | AheadThe Schlüter Euro Trac 1900/2000 LS is available with four-wheel drive; the Massey Ferguson 2775 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1977–1983 | 1991–1995 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Schlüter Euro Trac 1900/2000 LS is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Schlüter Euro Trac 1900/2000 LS is 14% heavier (862 kg / 1,900 lb) than the Massey Ferguson 2775 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Schlüter Euro Trac 1900/2000 LS has 200% more forward gears (16 gears) than the Massey Ferguson 2775 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The Schlüter Euro Trac 1900/2000 LS offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the Massey Ferguson 2775 does not (as stated by the sources).
- The Schlüter Euro Trac 1900/2000 LS is available with four-wheel drive; the Massey Ferguson 2775 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- The Schlüter Euro Trac 1900/2000 LS is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MF 2775 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Euro Trac 1900/2000 LS has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources