Massey Ferguson MF 2685 vs VALMET 8200

9 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1985–1987

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1993–1996

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the MF 2685 and the 8200 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

9 material differences · 6 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Massey Ferguson MF 2685 and VALMET 8200, field by field
Field	MF 2685	8200	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	128.3 hp	128.2 hp	—
Engine declared	Perkins AT 6.354.4	VALMET 634 D	differs
Displacement declared	5.80 L	7.37 L	+27% 8200
Maximum torque declared	321 lb·ft · 435 N·m	361 lb·ft · 490 N·m	+13% 8200
Transmission
Top speed declared	18.6 mph · 30 km/h	18.6–24.9 mph · 30–40 km/h	differs
Clutch declared	—	Pedal-operated, dry Fichtel & Sachs single-plate clutch	—
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared	—	17.8 gpm · 67.4 L/min	—
Pressure declared	—	2,901 psi · 200 bar	—
Three-point lift at ends declared	15,917 lb · 7,220 kg	—	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	540/1000 rpm	540/1000 rpm	—
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	12,941 lb · 5,870 kg	10,362 lb · 4,700 kg	+25% MF 2685
Maximum permissible mass declared	16,535 lb · 7,500 kg	16,535 lb · 7,500 kg	—
Wheelbase declared	107.3 in · 2,726 mm	100.7 in · 2,558 mm	+7% MF 2685
Length declared	200.0 in · 5,080 mm	186.8 in · 4,745 mm	+7% MF 2685
Width declared	95.3 in · 2,420 mm	86.6 in · 2,200 mm	+10% MF 2685
Height declared	114.2 in · 2,900 mm	108.7 in · 2,760 mm	—
Ground clearance declared	18.5 in · 470 mm	18.7 in · 475 mm	—
Turning radius, braked declared	16.1 ft · 4.90 m	15.5 ft · 4.71 m	—
Fuel tank declared	225.1 qt · 213.0 L	174.4 qt · 165.0 L	+29% MF 2685

Source

Source