Massey Ferguson MF 2685 or SAME Antares 130?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the MF 2685 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Antares 130 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Massey Ferguson 2685 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 35% (1,870 kg / 4,123 lb) more three-point lift.
  • The SAME Antares 130 suits road haulage better on this data: 33% (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Massey Ferguson MF 2685 and SAME Antares 130, with the call on each
QuestionMF 2685Antares 130Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?95.7 kW (128.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2685”96 kW (129 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Antares 130”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MF 2685 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Antares 130 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the MF 2685 and the Antares 130.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the MF 2685 and the Antares 130.
Which pumps more oil for implements?—57.1 L/min (15.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Antares 130”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the MF 2685.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?7,220 kg (15,917 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2685”5,350 kg (11,795 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Antares 130”AheadThe Massey Ferguson 2685 has 35% more lift (1,870 kg / 4,123 lb) than the SAME Antares 130 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?5,870 kg (12,941 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2685”5,250 kg (11,574 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Antares 130”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Massey Ferguson 2685 is 12% heavier (620 kg / 1,367 lb) than the SAME Antares 130 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?7,500 kg (16,535 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2685”8,100 kg (17,857 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Antares 130”EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which has the wider choice of gears?16Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2685”24 to 48Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Antares 130”AheadThe SAME Antares 130 has 50% more forward gears (8 gears) than the Massey Ferguson 2685 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MF 2685 and the Antares 130.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2685”40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Antares 130”AheadThe SAME Antares 130 has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the Massey Ferguson 2685 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2685”540/540E/1000E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Antares 130”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2685”—No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Antares 130.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2685”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Antares 130”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1985–19871991–1996Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The SAME Antares 130 is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Massey Ferguson 2685 has 35% more lift (1,870 kg / 4,123 lb) than the SAME Antares 130 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Massey Ferguson 2685 is 12% heavier (620 kg / 1,367 lb) than the SAME Antares 130 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The SAME Antares 130 has 50% more forward gears (8 gears) than the Massey Ferguson 2685 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The SAME Antares 130 has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the Massey Ferguson 2685 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The SAME Antares 130 is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MF 2685 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Antares 130 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources