Massey Ferguson MF 2680 or WHITE 120?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the MF 2680 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 120 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | MF 2680 | 120 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 88.3 kW (118.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2680” | 88 kW (118 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “White 120” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MF 2680 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 120 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the MF 2680 and the 120. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the MF 2680 and the 120. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 53.3 L/min (14.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2680” | 83.3 L/min (22.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “White 120” | AheadThe WHITE 120 has 56% more hydraulic flow (30.0 L/min / 7.9 gpm) than the Massey Ferguson MF 2680 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 5,200 kg (11,464 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2680” | 3,327 kg (7,335 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “White 120” | AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 2680 has 56% more lift (1,873 kg / 4,129 lb) than the WHITE 120 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 5,390 kg (11,883 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2680” | 5,512 kg (12,152 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “White 120” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 7,500 kg (16,535 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2680” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 120. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 16Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2680” | 18Traktorenlexikon, “White 120” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MF 2680 and the 120. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2680” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “White 120” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2680” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “White 120” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2680” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 120. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2680” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “White 120” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1980–1985 | 1987–1990 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The WHITE 120 is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The WHITE 120 has 56% more hydraulic flow (30.0 L/min / 7.9 gpm) than the Massey Ferguson MF 2680 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Massey Ferguson MF 2680 has 56% more lift (1,873 kg / 4,129 lb) than the WHITE 120 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The WHITE 120 is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MF 2680 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 120 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources