Massey Ferguson MF 2625 vs Massey Ferguson MF 699
6 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
Read our verdict on the MF 2625 and the MF 699 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.
Field by field
6 material differences · 4 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | MF 2625 | MF 699 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 93.7 hp | 94 hp | — |
| Engine declared | Perkins A 6.354-4 | Perkins A 6.354 | differs |
| Displacement declared | 5.80 L | 5.80 L | — |
| Maximum torque declared | 269 lb·ft · 365 N·m | 255 lb·ft · 346 N·m | +5% MF 2625 |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 18.6 mph · 30 km/h | 19.9 mph · 32 km/h | +7% MF 699 |
| Clutch declared | — | Dry disc clutch | — |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Hydraulic control declared | — | Constant flow | — |
| Pump flow declared | — | 16.8 gpm · 63.5 L/min | — |
| Three-point lift at ends declared | 12,081 lb · 5,480 kg | — | — |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 540/1000 rpm | 540/1000 rpm | — |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 12,015 lb · 5,450 kg | 8,984 lb · 4,075 kg | +34% MF 2625 |
| Maximum permissible mass declared | 16,535 lb · 7,500 kg | — | — |
| Wheelbase declared | 107.3 in · 2,726 mm | 101.6 in · 2,580 mm | +6% MF 2625 |
| Length declared | 200.0 in · 5,080 mm | 166.9 in · 4,240 mm | +20% MF 2625 |
| Width declared | 91.3 in · 2,320 mm | — | — |
| Height declared | 113.4 in · 2,880 mm | 108.3 in · 2,750 mm | — |
| Ground clearance declared | 17.7 in · 450 mm | — | — |
| Turning radius, braked declared | 16.1 ft · 4.90 m | — | — |
| Fuel tank declared | 225.1 qt · 213.0 L | — | — |
Massey Ferguson MF 2625 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2625”
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 399”
Massey Ferguson MF 699 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 699”