Massey Ferguson MF 250 vs SAME Solar 50 (DT)

9 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1983–1986

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1986–1997

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the MF 250 and the Solar 50 (DT) → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

9 material differences · 5 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Massey Ferguson MF 250 and SAME Solar 50 (DT), field by field
Field	MF 250	Solar 50 (DT)	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	46.4 hp	—	—
Engine declared	Perkins AD 3.152 S	SAME 983-L	differs
Displacement declared	2.50 L	2.72 L	+9% Solar 50 (DT)
Maximum torque declared	125 lb·ft · 170 N·m	104 lb·ft · 141 N·m	+21% MF 250
Transmission
Top speed declared	15.5 mph · 25 km/h	18.6 mph · 30 km/h	+20% Solar 50 (DT)
Clutch declared	pedal-operated dry and air-cooled Auburn double clutch	—	—
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared	5.2 gpm · 19.8 L/min	7.5 gpm · 28.5 L/min	+44% Solar 50 (DT)
Pressure declared	—	1,740 psi · 120 bar	—
Three-point lift at ends declared	3,197 lb · 1,450 kg	5,225 lb · 2,370 kg	+63% Solar 50 (DT)
Rear PTO speeds declared	540 rpm	540 rpm	—
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	4,674 lb · 2,120 kg	4,409 lb · 2,000 kg	+6% MF 250
Wheelbase declared	80.7 in · 2,050 mm	82.1 in · 2,085 mm	—
Length declared	135.8 in · 3,450 mm	133.3 in · 3,385 mm	—
Width declared	65.4 in · 1,660 mm	65.9 in · 1,675 mm	—
Height declared	87.4 in · 2,220 mm	89.8 in · 2,280 mm	—
Ground clearance declared	14.2 in · 360 mm	18.1 in · 460 mm	+28% Solar 50 (DT)
Turning radius, braked declared	10.8 ft · 3.30 m	—	—
Fuel tank declared	50.7 qt · 48 L	58.1 qt · 55.0 L	+15% Solar 50 (DT)

Source

Source