8 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor oneMassey Ferguson MF 2401982–1985No measured PTO figureTractor twoMassey Ferguson MF 2501983–1986No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the MF 240 and the MF 250 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

8 material differences · 9 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Massey Ferguson MF 240 and Massey Ferguson MF 250, field by field
Field	MF 240	MF 250	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	46.4 hp	46.4 hp	—
Engine declared	Perkins AD 3.152	Perkins AD 3.152 S	differs
Displacement declared	2.50 L	2.50 L	—
Maximum torque declared	127 lb·ft · 173 N·m	125 lb·ft · 170 N·m	—
Transmission
Top speed declared	15.5–18.6 mph · 25–30 km/h	15.5 mph · 25 km/h	differs
Clutch declared	Pedal-operated, dry and air-cooled Auburn dual clutch	pedal-operated dry and air-cooled Auburn double clutch	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared	5.2 gpm · 19.8 L/min	5.2 gpm · 19.8 L/min	—
Three-point lift, at the coupling points declared	3,153 lb · 1,430 kg	3,197 lb · 1,450 kg	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	540 rpm	540 rpm	—
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	3,924 lb · 1,780 kg	4,674 lb · 2,120 kg	+19% MF 250
Wheelbase declared	74.6 in · 1,896 mm	80.7 in · 2,050 mm	+8% MF 250
Length declared	124.8 in · 3,170 mm	135.8 in · 3,450 mm	+9% MF 250
Width declared	64.2 in · 1,630 mm	65.4 in · 1,660 mm	—
Height, over the safety frame declared	83.5 in · 2,120 mm	87.4 in · 2,220 mm	—
Ground clearance declared	12.2 in · 310 mm	14.2 in · 360 mm	+16% MF 250
Turning radius, braked declared	10.0 ft · 3.06 m	10.8 ft · 3.30 m	+8% MF 250
Fuel tank declared	50.7 qt · 48 L	50.7 qt · 48 L	—

Source

Source