Massey Ferguson MF 230 or Renault Super 5-D (A)?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Renault Super 5-D (A): three-point lift. It is also ahead on drive.
- The Renault Super 5-D (A) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 24% (345 kg / 761 lb) more three-point lift.
- The Renault Super 5-D (A) suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: four-wheel drive.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | MF 230 | Super 5-D (A) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 25.4 kW (34.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 230” | 24.9 kW (33.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Super 5D R7054” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the MF 230 and the Super 5-D (A). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the MF 230 and the Super 5-D (A). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 17.0 L/min (4.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 230” | 18.0 L/min (4.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Super 5D R7054” | EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,415 kg (3,120 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 230” | 1,760 kg (3,880 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Super 5D R7054” | AheadThe Renault Super 5-D (A) has 24% more lift (345 kg / 761 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 230 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 1,730 kg (3,814 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 230” | 1,585 kg (3,494 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Super 5D R7054” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the MF 230 and the Super 5-D (A). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 6 to 8Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 230” | 10Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Super 5D R7054” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MF 230 and the Super 5-D (A). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 230” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Super 5D R7054” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 230” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Super 5D R7054” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 230” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Super 5-D (A). |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 230” | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Super 5D R7054” | AheadThe Renault Super 5-D (A) is available with four-wheel drive; the Massey Ferguson MF 230 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1976–1983 | 1965–1967 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Massey Ferguson MF 230 is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Renault Super 5-D (A) has 24% more lift (345 kg / 761 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 230 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Renault Super 5-D (A) is available with four-wheel drive; the Massey Ferguson MF 230 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- The Massey Ferguson MF 230 is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources