Massey Ferguson MF 135 (Massey Ferguson) or ZETOR 35 Super?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the MF 135 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 35 Super has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Massey Ferguson MF 135 suits road haulage better on this data: 40% (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Massey Ferguson MF 135 (Massey Ferguson) and ZETOR 35 Super, with the call on each
QuestionMF 13535 SuperCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?30.9 kW (41.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 135”30.9 kW (41.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 35 Super”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MF 135 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 35 Super has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the MF 135 and the 35 Super.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the MF 135 and the 35 Super.
Which pumps more oil for implements?18.4 L/min (4.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 135”12.5 L/min (3.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 35 Super”AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 135 has 47% more hydraulic flow (5.9 L/min / 1.6 gpm) than the ZETOR 35 Super (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,300 kg (2,866 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 135”1,530 kg (3,373 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 35 Super”AheadThe ZETOR 35 Super has 18% more lift (230 kg / 507 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 135 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?1,705 kg (3,759 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 135”2,860 kg (6,305 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 35 Super”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The ZETOR 35 Super is 68% heavier (1,155 kg / 2,546 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 135 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the MF 135 and the 35 Super.
Which has the wider choice of gears?6 to 8Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 135”5 to 9Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 35 Super”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MF 135 and the 35 Super.
Which is faster on the road?35 km/h (21.7 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 135”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 35 Super”AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 135 has 40% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the ZETOR 35 Super (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 135”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 35 Super”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 135”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 35 Super.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 135”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 35 Super”EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1964–19781955–1960Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Massey Ferguson MF 135 is newer: production began 9 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Massey Ferguson MF 135 has 47% more hydraulic flow (5.9 L/min / 1.6 gpm) than the ZETOR 35 Super (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The ZETOR 35 Super has 18% more lift (230 kg / 507 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 135 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The ZETOR 35 Super is 68% heavier (1,155 kg / 2,546 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 135 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Massey Ferguson MF 135 has 40% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the ZETOR 35 Super (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The Massey Ferguson MF 135 is newer: production began 9 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
  • Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MF 135 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 35 Super has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources