Massey Ferguson MF 135 (Massey Ferguson) or Renault R-56?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the MF 135 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the R-56 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Renault R-56 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 54% (700 kg / 1,543 lb) more three-point lift.
- The Massey Ferguson MF 135 suits road haulage better on this data: 40% (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | MF 135 | R-56 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 30.9 kW (41.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 135” | 30.9 kW (41.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 56 R7251” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MF 135 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the R-56 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the MF 135 and the R-56. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the MF 135 and the R-56. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 18.4 L/min (4.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 135” | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the R-56. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,300 kg (2,866 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 135” | 2,000 kg (4,409 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 56 R7251” | AheadThe Renault R-56 has 54% more lift (700 kg / 1,543 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 135 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 1,705 kg (3,759 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 135” | 1,900 kg (4,189 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 56 R7251” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault R-56 is 11% heavier (195 kg / 430 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 135 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the MF 135 and the R-56. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 6 to 8Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 135” | 6 to 10Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 56 R7251” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MF 135 and the R-56. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 35 km/h (21.7 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 135” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 56 R7251” | AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 135 has 40% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the Renault R-56 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 135” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 56 R7251” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 135” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 56 R7251” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 135” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 56 R7251” | EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1964–1978 | 1967–1973 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Renault R-56 has 54% more lift (700 kg / 1,543 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 135 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Renault R-56 is 11% heavier (195 kg / 430 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 135 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Massey Ferguson MF 135 has 40% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the Renault R-56 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MF 135 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the R-56 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources