Massey Ferguson MF 1155 or OLIVER 2255 (4 WD)?

Which should you choose?

On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level. On features, the OLIVER 2255 (4 WD) is ahead on top speed.

  • The OLIVER 2255 (4 WD) suits road haulage better on this data: 11% (3.0 km/h / 1.9 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Massey Ferguson MF 1155 and OLIVER 2255 (4 WD), with the call on each
QuestionMF 11552255 (4 WD)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?103.6 kW (139.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1155”107.9 kW (144.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Oliver 2255”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the MF 1155 and the 2255 (4 WD).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the MF 1155 and the 2255 (4 WD).
Which pumps more oil for implements?—75.7 L/min (20.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Oliver 2255”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the MF 1155.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?3,265 kg (7,198 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1155”2,720 kg (5,997 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Oliver 2255”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the MF 1155: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1155”); the 2255 (4 WD): lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Oliver 2255”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?5,330 kg (11,751 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1155”7,442 kg (16,407 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Oliver 2255”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The OLIVER 2255 (4 WD) is 40% heavier (2,112 kg / 4,656 lb) than the Massey Ferguson 1155 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?——No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the MF 1155 and the 2255 (4 WD).
Which has the wider choice of gears?8 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1155”6 to 18Traktorenlexikon, “Oliver 2255”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MF 1155 and the 2255 (4 WD).
Which is faster on the road?27 km/h (16.8 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1155”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Oliver 2255”AheadThe OLIVER 2255 (4 WD) has 11% more top speed (3.0 km/h / 1.9 mph) than the Massey Ferguson 1155 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1155”1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Oliver 2255”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1155”—No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 2255 (4 WD).
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1155”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Oliver 2255”EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1973–19781972–1976EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The OLIVER 2255 (4 WD) is 40% heavier (2,112 kg / 4,656 lb) than the Massey Ferguson 1155 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The OLIVER 2255 (4 WD) has 11% more top speed (3.0 km/h / 1.9 mph) than the Massey Ferguson 1155 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the MF 1155: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1155”); the 2255 (4 WD): lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Oliver 2255”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources