Massey Ferguson MF 1134 (A) or WHITE 2-135?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the MF 1134 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2-135 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The WHITE 2-135 suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | MF 1134 (A) | 2-135 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 99.4 kW (133.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1134” | 100.8 kW (135.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-135” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MF 1134 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2-135 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the MF 1134 (A) and the 2-135. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the MF 1134 (A) and the 2-135. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 58.5 L/min (15.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1134” | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 2-135. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 5,400 kg (11,905 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1134” | 2,903 kg (6,400 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-135” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the MF 1134 (A): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1134”); the 2-135: lift 610 mm behind the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-135”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 5,050 kg (11,133 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1134” | 6,433 kg (14,182 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-135” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The WHITE 2-135 is 27% heavier (1,383 kg / 3,049 lb) than the Massey Ferguson 1134 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the MF 1134 (A) and the 2-135. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1134” | 18Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-135” | AheadThe WHITE 2-135 has 50% more forward gears (6 gears) than the Massey Ferguson 1134 (A) (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MF 1134 (A) and the 2-135. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1134” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-135” | AheadThe WHITE 2-135 has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Massey Ferguson 1134 (A) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1134” | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “White 2-135” | AheadThe Massey Ferguson 1134 (A) offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the WHITE 2-135 does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1134” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “White 2-135” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1134” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “White 2-135” | AheadThe Massey Ferguson 1134 (A) is available with four-wheel drive; the WHITE 2-135 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1978–1990 | 1976–1982 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The WHITE 2-135 is 27% heavier (1,383 kg / 3,049 lb) than the Massey Ferguson 1134 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The WHITE 2-135 has 50% more forward gears (6 gears) than the Massey Ferguson 1134 (A) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The WHITE 2-135 has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Massey Ferguson 1134 (A) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Massey Ferguson 1134 (A) offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the WHITE 2-135 does not (as stated by the sources).
- The Massey Ferguson 1134 (A) is available with four-wheel drive; the WHITE 2-135 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MF 1134 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2-135 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the MF 1134 (A): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1134”); the 2-135: lift 610 mm behind the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-135”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources