Massey Ferguson MF 1134 (A) or Renault 145-54 TX?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the MF 1134 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 145-54 TX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Renault 145-54 TX suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Massey Ferguson MF 1134 (A) and Renault 145-54 TX, with the call on each
QuestionMF 1134 (A)145-54 TXCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?99.4 kW (133.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1134”99.4 kW (133.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 145-54 TE/TA/TS/TX/TZ R7942”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MF 1134 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 145-54 TX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the MF 1134 (A) and the 145-54 TX.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the MF 1134 (A) and the 145-54 TX.
Which pumps more oil for implements?58.5 L/min (15.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1134”41.1 L/min (10.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 145-54 TE/TA/TS/TX/TZ R7942”AheadThe Massey Ferguson 1134 (A) has 42% more hydraulic flow (17.4 L/min / 4.6 gpm) than the Renault 145-54 TX (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?5,400 kg (11,905 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1134”8,850 kg (19,511 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 145-54 TE/TA/TS/TX/TZ R7942”AheadThe Renault 145-54 TX has 64% more lift (3,450 kg / 7,606 lb) than the Massey Ferguson 1134 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?5,050 kg (11,133 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1134”5,655 kg (12,467 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 145-54 TE/TA/TS/TX/TZ R7942”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault 145-54 TX is 12% heavier (605 kg / 1,334 lb) than the Massey Ferguson 1134 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?—8,500 kg (18,739 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 145-54 TE/TA/TS/TX/TZ R7942”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the MF 1134 (A).
Which has the wider choice of gears?12Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1134”16Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 145-54 TE/TA/TS/TX/TZ R7942”AheadThe Renault 145-54 TX has 33% more forward gears (4 gears) than the Massey Ferguson 1134 (A) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MF 1134 (A) and the 145-54 TX.
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1134”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 145-54 TE/TA/TS/TX/TZ R7942”AheadThe Renault 145-54 TX has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Massey Ferguson 1134 (A) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1134”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 145-54 TE/TA/TS/TX/TZ R7942”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1134”—No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 145-54 TX.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1134”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 145-54 TE/TA/TS/TX/TZ R7942”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1978–19901989–1990Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault 145-54 TX is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Massey Ferguson 1134 (A) has 42% more hydraulic flow (17.4 L/min / 4.6 gpm) than the Renault 145-54 TX (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault 145-54 TX has 64% more lift (3,450 kg / 7,606 lb) than the Massey Ferguson 1134 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault 145-54 TX is 12% heavier (605 kg / 1,334 lb) than the Massey Ferguson 1134 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault 145-54 TX has 33% more forward gears (4 gears) than the Massey Ferguson 1134 (A) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault 145-54 TX has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Massey Ferguson 1134 (A) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault 145-54 TX is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MF 1134 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 145-54 TX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources