Massey Ferguson MF 1080 (A) or Renault 891 (S)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the MF 1080 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 891 (S) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Renault 891 (S) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 23% (6.1 L/min / 1.6 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 23% (640 kg / 1,411 lb) more three-point lift.
  • The Massey Ferguson MF 1080 (A) suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: four-wheel drive.
  • The Massey Ferguson MF 1080 (A) suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Massey Ferguson MF 1080 (A) and Renault 891 (S), with the call on each
QuestionMF 1080 (A)891 (S)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?64.8 kW (86.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1080”65.5 kW (87.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 891 R7681”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MF 1080 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 891 (S) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the MF 1080 (A) and the 891 (S).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the MF 1080 (A) and the 891 (S).
Which pumps more oil for implements?26.5 L/min (7.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1080”32.6 L/min (8.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 891 R7681”AheadThe Renault 891 (S) has 23% more hydraulic flow (6.1 L/min / 1.6 gpm) than the Massey Ferguson MF 1080 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,800 kg (6,173 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1080”3,440 kg (7,584 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 891 R7681”AheadThe Renault 891 (S) has 23% more lift (640 kg / 1,411 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 1080 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?3,870 kg (8,532 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1080”3,950 kg (8,708 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 891 R7681”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the MF 1080 (A) and the 891 (S).
Which has the wider choice of gears?12Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1080”12 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 891 R7681”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?YesTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 891 R7681”No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MF 1080 (A).
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1080”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 891 R7681”AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 1080 (A) has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Renault 891 (S) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1080”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 891 R7681”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1080”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 891 (S).
Which drives on both axles?2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1080”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 891 R7681”AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 1080 (A) is available with four-wheel drive; the Renault 891 (S) is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1969–19741977–1982Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault 891 (S) is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Renault 891 (S) has 23% more hydraulic flow (6.1 L/min / 1.6 gpm) than the Massey Ferguson MF 1080 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault 891 (S) has 23% more lift (640 kg / 1,411 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 1080 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Massey Ferguson MF 1080 (A) has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Renault 891 (S) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The Massey Ferguson MF 1080 (A) is available with four-wheel drive; the Renault 891 (S) is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • The Renault 891 (S) is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MF 1080 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 891 (S) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources