Massey Ferguson MF 1007 (A) or Massey Ferguson MF 3080 (A)?

Which should you choose?

The figures split: the Massey Ferguson MF 3080 (A) is ahead on hydraulic flow and forward gears; the Massey Ferguson MF 1007 (A) is ahead on three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Massey Ferguson MF 1007 (A) and Massey Ferguson MF 3080 (A), with the call on each
QuestionMF 1007 (A)MF 3080 (A)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?62.6 kW (83.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1007”62.9 kW (84.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3080”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the MF 1007 (A) and the MF 3080 (A).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the MF 1007 (A) and the MF 3080 (A).
Which pumps more oil for implements?43.7 L/min (11.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1007”51.2 L/min (13.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3080”AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 3080 (A) has 17% more hydraulic flow (7.5 L/min / 2.0 gpm) than the Massey Ferguson MF 1007 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?4,300 kg (9,480 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1007”3,809 kg (8,397 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3080”AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 1007 (A) has 13% more lift (491 kg / 1,083 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 3080 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?3,580 kg (7,893 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1007”5,170 kg (11,398 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3080”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Massey Ferguson MF 3080 (A) is 44% heavier (1,590 kg / 3,505 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 1007 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?6,500 kg (14,330 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1007”7,000 kg (15,432 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3080”EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which has the wider choice of gears?24Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1007”32Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3080”AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 3080 (A) has 33% more forward gears (8 gears) than the Massey Ferguson MF 1007 (A) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MF 1007 (A) and the MF 3080 (A).
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1007”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3080”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1007”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3080”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3080”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the MF 1007 (A).
Which drives on both axles?2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1007”2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3080”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1987–19941989–1997EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Massey Ferguson MF 3080 (A) has 17% more hydraulic flow (7.5 L/min / 2.0 gpm) than the Massey Ferguson MF 1007 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Massey Ferguson MF 1007 (A) has 13% more lift (491 kg / 1,083 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 3080 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Massey Ferguson MF 3080 (A) is 44% heavier (1,590 kg / 3,505 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 1007 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Massey Ferguson MF 3080 (A) has 33% more forward gears (8 gears) than the Massey Ferguson MF 1007 (A) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources