Massey Ferguson MF 8245 vs WHITE 160
5 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
We will not advise between these two machines, because their unladen weight differs by more than 25% (42%); the drive differs (4WD; Two-wheel or four-wheel drive); they were not built in overlapping years (1999–2003; 1987–1990). The figures below are side by side so you can judge them yourself; each says whether it was measured, claimed or declared by its source.
Field by field
5 material differences · 3 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | MF 8245 | 160 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 160.0 hp | 159.8 hp | — |
| Engine declared | — | CUMMINS CT 6-830 | — |
| Displacement declared | — | 8.28 L | — |
| Maximum torque declared | — | 421 lb·ft · 571 N·m | — |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 24.9 mph · 40 km/h | 18.6 mph · 30 km/h | +33% MF 8245 |
| Clutch declared | Wet multi-disc clutch | — | — |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Hydraulic centre declared | — | Open centre | — |
| Pump flow declared | — | 22.0 gpm · 83.3 L/min | — |
| Three-point lift at ends declared | — | 7,035 lb · 3,191 kg | — |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 540/1000 rpm | 1000 rpm | differs |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 18,799 lb · 8,527 kg | 13,195 lb · 5,985 kg | +42% MF 8245 |
| Wheelbase declared | 120.9 in · 3,070 mm | 112.0 in · 2,845 mm | +8% MF 8245 |
| Length declared | 201.2 in · 5,110 mm | 180.0 in · 4,572 mm | +12% MF 8245 |
| Width declared | 97.6 in · 2,480 mm | 96.0 in · 2,438 mm | — |
| Height declared | 119.7 in · 3,040 mm | 120.0 in · 3,048 mm | — |
| Ground clearance declared | — | 23.0 in · 584 mm | — |
| Turning radius, braked declared | — | 13.6 ft · 4.15 m | — |
| Fuel tank declared | — | 140.5–156.4 qt · 133.0–148.0 L | — |
Massey Ferguson MF 8245 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8245”
WHITE 160 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “White 160”