Massey Ferguson MF 8240 A or New Holland-Fiat G 170?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the MF 8240 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the G 170 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Massey Ferguson MF 8240 A suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 22% (1,573 kg / 3,467 lb) more three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Massey Ferguson MF 8240 A and New Holland-Fiat G 170, with the call on each
QuestionMF 8240 AG 170Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?125.1 kW (167.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8240”125.1 kW (167.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G170”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MF 8240 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the G 170 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the MF 8240 A and the G 170.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the MF 8240 A and the G 170.
Which pumps more oil for implements?116.8 L/min (30.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8240”125.6 L/min (33.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G170”EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?8,770 kg (19,334 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8240”7,197 kg (15,867 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G170”AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 8240 A has 22% more lift (1,573 kg / 3,467 lb) than the New Holland-Fiat G 170 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?6,980 kg (15,388 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8240”7,622 kg (16,804 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G170”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?12,000 kg (26,455 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8240”11,500 kg (25,353 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G170”EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which has the wider choice of gears?18 to 32Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8240”16 to 18Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G170”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MF 8240 A and the G 170.
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8240”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G170”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8240”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G170”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8240”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G170”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8240”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G170”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1999–20021993–2003Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Massey Ferguson MF 8240 A is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Massey Ferguson MF 8240 A has 22% more lift (1,573 kg / 3,467 lb) than the New Holland-Fiat G 170 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Massey Ferguson MF 8240 A is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MF 8240 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the G 170 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources