Massey Ferguson MF 8170 A or Massey Ferguson MF 8270 A?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Massey Ferguson MF 8170 A: maximum permissible mass.

  • The Massey Ferguson MF 8170 A suits road haulage better on this data: 11% (1,500 kg / 3,307 lb) more maximum permissible mass.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Massey Ferguson MF 8170 A and Massey Ferguson MF 8270 A, with the call on each
QuestionMF 8170 AMF 8270 ACall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?160.0 kW (214.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8170”160.0 kW (214.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8270”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the MF 8170 A and the MF 8270 A.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the MF 8170 A and the MF 8270 A.
Which pumps more oil for implements?118.2 L/min (31.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8170”122.5 L/min (32.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8270”EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?9,900 kg (21,826 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8170”10,401 kg (22,931 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8270”EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which is heavier, for traction?9,740 kg (21,473 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8170”9,795 kg (21,594 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8270”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?15,500 kg (34,172 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8170”14,000 kg (30,865 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8270”AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 8170 A has 11% higher maximum permissible mass (1,500 kg / 3,307 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 8270 A (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
Which has the wider choice of gears?18Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8170”18Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8270”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MF 8170 A and the MF 8270 A.
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8170”40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8270”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8170”540/540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8270”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8170”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8270”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8170”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8270”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1998–19991999–2002EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Massey Ferguson MF 8170 A has 11% higher maximum permissible mass (1,500 kg / 3,307 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 8270 A (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources