Massey Ferguson MF 8140 A or VALMET 8550?

Which should you choose?

The figures split: the VALMET 8550 is ahead on hydraulic flow and three-point lift; the Massey Ferguson MF 8140 A is ahead on maximum permissible mass.

  • The VALMET 8550 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 38% (20.3 L/min / 5.4 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 22% (1,260 kg / 2,778 lb) more three-point lift.
  • The Massey Ferguson MF 8140 A suits road haulage better on this data: 35% (3,000 kg / 6,614 lb) more maximum permissible mass.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Massey Ferguson MF 8140 A and VALMET 8550, with the call on each
QuestionMF 8140 A8550Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?109.8 kW (147.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8140”108.1 kW (145.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet Mega-8550”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the MF 8140 A and the 8550.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the MF 8140 A and the 8550.
Which pumps more oil for implements?53.3 L/min (14.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8140”73.6 L/min (19.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet Mega-8550”AheadThe VALMET 8550 has 38% more hydraulic flow (20.3 L/min / 5.4 gpm) than the Massey Ferguson MF 8140 A (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?5,640 kg (12,434 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8140”6,900 kg (15,212 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet Mega-8550”AheadThe VALMET 8550 has 22% more lift (1,260 kg / 2,778 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 8140 A (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?6,115 kg (13,481 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8140”5,100 kg (11,244 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet Mega-8550”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Massey Ferguson MF 8140 A is 20% heavier (1,015 kg / 2,238 lb) than the VALMET 8550 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?11,500 kg (25,353 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8140”8,500 kg (18,739 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet Mega-8550”AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 8140 A has 35% higher maximum permissible mass (3,000 kg / 6,614 lb) than the VALMET 8550 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
Which has the wider choice of gears?32 to 48Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8140”36Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet Mega-8550”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MF 8140 A and the 8550.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8140”40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet Mega-8550”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8140”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet Mega-8550”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8140”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet Mega-8550”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8140”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet Mega-8550”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1995–19991995–2001EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The VALMET 8550 has 38% more hydraulic flow (20.3 L/min / 5.4 gpm) than the Massey Ferguson MF 8140 A (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The VALMET 8550 has 22% more lift (1,260 kg / 2,778 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 8140 A (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Massey Ferguson MF 8140 A is 20% heavier (1,015 kg / 2,238 lb) than the VALMET 8550 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Massey Ferguson MF 8140 A has 35% higher maximum permissible mass (3,000 kg / 6,614 lb) than the VALMET 8550 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources