Massey Ferguson MF 8120 A or WHITE 6144?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the MF 8120 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 6144 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The WHITE 6144 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 124% (65.9 L/min / 17.4 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “similar machines”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Massey Ferguson MF 8120 A and WHITE 6144, with the call on each
QuestionMF 8120 A6144Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?106.7 kW (143.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8120”106.6 kW (143.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “White 6144”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MF 8120 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 6144 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the MF 8120 A and the 6144.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the MF 8120 A and the 6144.
Which pumps more oil for implements?53.3 L/min (14.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8120”119.2 L/min (31.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “White 6144”AheadThe WHITE 6144 has 124% more hydraulic flow (65.9 L/min / 17.4 gpm) than the Massey Ferguson MF 8120 A (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?5,640 kg (12,434 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8120”5,486 kg (12,095 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “White 6144”EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which is heavier, for traction?5,640 kg (12,434 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8120”6,016 kg (13,263 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-White 6144”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?11,500 kg (25,353 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8120”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 6144.
Which has the wider choice of gears?32Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8120”32Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-White 6144”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MF 8120 A and the 6144.
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8120”40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “White 6144”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8120”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-White 6144”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8120”independentTraktorenlexikon, “White 6144”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8120”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “White 6144”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1995–19991994–1997EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The WHITE 6144 has 124% more hydraulic flow (65.9 L/min / 17.4 gpm) than the Massey Ferguson MF 8120 A (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MF 8120 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 6144 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources