Massey Ferguson MF 7475 or New Holland TSA 135?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the MF 7475 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the TSA 135 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Massey Ferguson 7475 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 24% (23.4 L/min / 6.2 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Massey Ferguson MF 7475 and New Holland TSA 135, with the call on each
QuestionMF 7475TSA 135Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?99.4 kW (133.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 7475”100 kW (134 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TSA135”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MF 7475 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the TSA 135 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the MF 7475 and the TSA 135.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the MF 7475 and the TSA 135.
Which pumps more oil for implements?119.9 L/min (31.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 7475”96.5 L/min (25.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TSA135”AheadThe Massey Ferguson 7475 has 24% more hydraulic flow (23.4 L/min / 6.2 gpm) than the New Holland TSA 135 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?—5,885 kg (12,974 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TSA135”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the MF 7475.
Which is heavier, for traction?6,250 kg (13,779 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 7475”5,527 kg (12,185 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TSA135”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Massey Ferguson 7475 is 13% heavier (723 kg / 1,594 lb) than the New Holland TSA 135 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?9,500 kg (20,944 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 7475”8,700 kg (19,180 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TSA135”EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which has the wider choice of gears?Stepless (CVT)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 7475”12 to 24 forwardTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TSA135”DifferTransmissions differ in kind: the Massey Ferguson 7475 is stepless (CVT) and the New Holland TSA 135 has 12 to 24 forward gears — not called.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MF 7475 and the TSA 135.
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 7475”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TSA135”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 7475”540/540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TSA135”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?—independentTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TSA135”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the MF 7475.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 7475”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TSA135”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?2004–20122003–2005EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Massey Ferguson 7475 has 24% more hydraulic flow (23.4 L/min / 6.2 gpm) than the New Holland TSA 135 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Massey Ferguson 7475 is 13% heavier (723 kg / 1,594 lb) than the New Holland TSA 135 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Transmissions differ in kind: the Massey Ferguson 7475 is stepless (CVT) and the New Holland TSA 135 has 12 to 24 forward gears — not called.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MF 7475 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the TSA 135 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources