Massey Ferguson MF 6475 A or Massey Ferguson MF 7475?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the MF 6475 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 7475 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Massey Ferguson 7475 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 16% (16.9 L/min / 4.5 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | MF 6475 A | MF 7475 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 99.4 kW (133.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6475” | 99.4 kW (133.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 7475” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MF 6475 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 7475 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the MF 6475 A and the MF 7475. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the MF 6475 A and the MF 7475. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 103.0 L/min (27.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6475” | 119.9 L/min (31.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 7475” | AheadThe Massey Ferguson 7475 has 16% more hydraulic flow (16.9 L/min / 4.5 gpm) than the Massey Ferguson 6475A (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 7,100 kg (15,653 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6475” | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the MF 7475. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 5,960 kg (13,140 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6475” | 6,250 kg (13,779 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 7475” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 9,250 kg (20,393 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6475” | 9,500 kg (20,944 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 7475” | EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 24 to 32 forwardTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6475” | Stepless (CVT)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 7475” | DifferTransmissions differ in kind: the Massey Ferguson 6475A has 24 to 32 forward gears and the Massey Ferguson 7475 is stepless (CVT) — not called. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MF 6475 A and the MF 7475. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6475” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 7475” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6475” | 540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 7475” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the MF 6475 A and the MF 7475. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6475” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 7475” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2003–2012 | 2004–2012 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Massey Ferguson 7475 has 16% more hydraulic flow (16.9 L/min / 4.5 gpm) than the Massey Ferguson 6475A (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Transmissions differ in kind: the Massey Ferguson 6475A has 24 to 32 forward gears and the Massey Ferguson 7475 is stepless (CVT) — not called.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MF 6475 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 7475 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources