Massey Ferguson MF 6270 (A) or ZETOR 11741?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Massey Ferguson MF 6270 (A): hydraulic flow.

  • The Massey Ferguson MF 6270 (A) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 50% (31.7 L/min / 8.4 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Massey Ferguson MF 6270 (A) and ZETOR 11741, with the call on each
QuestionMF 6270 (A)11741Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?77.2 kW (103.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6270”77.7 kW (104.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 11741 (2002-2007)”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the MF 6270 (A) and the 11741.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the MF 6270 (A) and the 11741.
Which pumps more oil for implements?95.7 L/min (25.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6270”64.0 L/min (16.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 11741 (2002-2007)”AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 6270 (A) has 50% more hydraulic flow (31.7 L/min / 8.4 gpm) than the ZETOR 11741 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?4,250 kg (9,370 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6270”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 11741.
Which is heavier, for traction?4,355 kg (9,601 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6270”4,696 kg (10,353 lb)Wikipedia (pl): Zetor 11741 (open data)EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?8,800 kg (19,401 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6270”8,500 kg (18,739 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 11741 (2002-2007)”EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which has the wider choice of gears?16 to 32Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6270”24Wikipedia (pl): Zetor 11741 (open data)EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MF 6270 (A) and the 11741.
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6270”40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 11741 (2002-2007)”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000/540E/1000E rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6270”540/540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 11741 (2002-2007)”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6270”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 11741 (2002-2007)”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6270”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 11741 (2002-2007)”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1999–20032002–2007EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Massey Ferguson MF 6270 (A) has 50% more hydraulic flow (31.7 L/min / 8.4 gpm) than the ZETOR 11741 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources