Massey Ferguson MF 6270 (A) or New Holland TM 125 (Traktorenlexikon)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the MF 6270 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the TM 125 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The New Holland TM 125 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 22% (21.2 L/min / 5.6 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 54% (2,310 kg / 5,093 lb) more three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Massey Ferguson MF 6270 (A) and New Holland TM 125 (Traktorenlexikon), with the call on each
QuestionMF 6270 (A)TM 125Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?84.6 kW (113.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6270”84.6 kW (113.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM125”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MF 6270 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the TM 125 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the MF 6270 (A) and the TM 125.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the MF 6270 (A) and the TM 125.
Which pumps more oil for implements?95.7 L/min (25.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6270”116.9 L/min (30.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM125”AheadThe New Holland TM 125 has 22% more hydraulic flow (21.2 L/min / 5.6 gpm) than the Massey Ferguson 6270 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?4,250 kg (9,370 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6270”6,560 kg (14,462 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM125”AheadThe New Holland TM 125 has 54% more lift (2,310 kg / 5,093 lb) than the Massey Ferguson 6270 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?4,355 kg (9,601 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6270”5,337 kg (11,766 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM125”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The New Holland TM 125 is 23% heavier (982 kg / 2,165 lb) than the Massey Ferguson 6270 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?8,800 kg (19,401 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6270”8,500 kg (18,739 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM125”EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which has the wider choice of gears?16 to 32Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6270”18 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM125”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MF 6270 (A) and the TM 125.
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6270”40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM125”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000/540E/1000E rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6270”540/540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM125”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6270”independentTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM125”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6270”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM125”; OECD test report 1918, 2000EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1999–20031999–2002EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The New Holland TM 125 has 22% more hydraulic flow (21.2 L/min / 5.6 gpm) than the Massey Ferguson 6270 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The New Holland TM 125 has 54% more lift (2,310 kg / 5,093 lb) than the Massey Ferguson 6270 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The New Holland TM 125 is 23% heavier (982 kg / 2,165 lb) than the Massey Ferguson 6270 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MF 6270 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the TM 125 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources