Massey Ferguson MF 6170 (A) or New Holland TS 110 (A)?

Which should you choose?

The figures split: the New Holland TS 110 (A) is ahead on hydraulic flow; the Massey Ferguson MF 6170 (A) is ahead on maximum permissible mass.

  • The New Holland TS 110 (A) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 57% (28.6 L/min / 7.6 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
  • The Massey Ferguson MF 6170 (A) suits road haulage better on this data: 25% (1,500 kg / 3,307 lb) more maximum permissible mass.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Massey Ferguson MF 6170 (A) and New Holland TS 110 (A), with the call on each
QuestionMF 6170 (A)TS 110 (A)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?72.9 kW (97.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6170”72.6 kW (97.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TS110”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the MF 6170 (A) and the TS 110 (A).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the MF 6170 (A) and the TS 110 (A).
Which pumps more oil for implements?50.4 L/min (13.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6170”79.0 L/min (20.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TS110”AheadThe New Holland TS 110 (A) has 57% more hydraulic flow (28.6 L/min / 7.6 gpm) than the Massey Ferguson MF 6170 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?3,717 kg (8,194 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6170”3,520 kg (7,760 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TS110”EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which is heavier, for traction?4,440 kg (9,789 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6170”3,949 kg (8,706 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TS110”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Massey Ferguson MF 6170 (A) is 12% heavier (491 kg / 1,082 lb) than the New Holland TS 110 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?7,500 kg (16,535 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6170”6,000 kg (13,228 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TS110”AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 6170 (A) has 25% higher maximum permissible mass (1,500 kg / 3,307 lb) than the New Holland TS 110 (A) (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
Which has the wider choice of gears?30 to 32Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6170”12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TS110”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MF 6170 (A) and the TS 110 (A).
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6170”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TS110”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000/540E/1000E rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6170”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TS110”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6170”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the TS 110 (A).
Which drives on both axles?2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6170”2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TS110”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1995–19991997–2003EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The New Holland TS 110 (A) has 57% more hydraulic flow (28.6 L/min / 7.6 gpm) than the Massey Ferguson MF 6170 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Massey Ferguson MF 6170 (A) is 12% heavier (491 kg / 1,082 lb) than the New Holland TS 110 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Massey Ferguson MF 6170 (A) has 25% higher maximum permissible mass (1,500 kg / 3,307 lb) than the New Holland TS 110 (A) (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources