Massey Ferguson MF 6120 (A) or Massey Ferguson MF 397 A?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the MF 6120 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 397 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Massey Ferguson MF 6120 (A) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 12% (350 kg / 772 lb) more three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Massey Ferguson MF 6120 (A) and Massey Ferguson MF 397 A, with the call on each
QuestionMF 6120 (A)MF 397 ACall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?58.9 kW (79.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6120(F)”58.9 kW (79.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 397”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MF 6120 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 397 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the MF 6120 (A) and the MF 397 A.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the MF 6120 (A) and the MF 397 A.
Which pumps more oil for implements?51.5 L/min (13.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6120(F)”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the MF 397 A.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?3,350 kg (7,385 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6120(F)”3,000 kg (6,614 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 397”AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 6120 (A) has 12% more lift (350 kg / 772 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 397 A (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?3,570 kg (7,871 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6120(F)”3,890 kg (8,576 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 397”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the MF 6120 (A) and the MF 397 A.
Which has the wider choice of gears?16Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6120(F)”24Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 397”AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 397 A has 50% more forward gears (8 gears) than the Massey Ferguson MF 6120 (A) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MF 6120 (A) and the MF 397 A.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6120(F)”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 397”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6120(F)”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 397”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6120(F)”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the MF 397 A.
Which drives on both axles?2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6120(F)”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 397”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1995–19991987–1994Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Massey Ferguson MF 6120 (A) is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Massey Ferguson MF 6120 (A) has 12% more lift (350 kg / 772 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 397 A (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Massey Ferguson MF 397 A has 50% more forward gears (8 gears) than the Massey Ferguson MF 6120 (A) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The Massey Ferguson MF 6120 (A) is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MF 6120 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 397 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources