Massey Ferguson MF 5475 (A) or VALMET 8350?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the MF 5475 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8350 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Massey Ferguson MF 5475 (A) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 44% (33.4 L/min / 8.8 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | MF 5475 (A) | 8350 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 99.4 kW (133.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 5475” | 99.3 kW (133.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet Mega-8350” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MF 5475 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8350 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the MF 5475 (A) and the 8350. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the MF 5475 (A) and the 8350. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 109.8 L/min (29.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 5475” | 76.4 L/min (20.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet Mega-8350” | AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 5475 (A) has 44% more hydraulic flow (33.4 L/min / 8.8 gpm) than the VALMET 8350 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | — | 6,800 kg (14,991 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet Mega-8350” | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the MF 5475 (A). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 4,495 kg (9,910 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 5475” | 6,490 kg (14,308 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet Mega-8350” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The VALMET 8350 is 44% heavier (1,995 kg / 4,398 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 5475 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 8,400 kg (18,519 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 5475” | 9,000 kg (19,842 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet Mega-8350” | EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 16Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 5475” | 36Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet Mega-8350” | AheadThe VALMET 8350 has 125% more forward gears (20 gears) than the Massey Ferguson MF 5475 (A) (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MF 5475 (A) and the 8350. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 5475” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet Mega-8350” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 5475” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet Mega-8350” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet Mega-8350” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the MF 5475 (A). |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 5475” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet Mega-8350” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2007–2012 | 1998–2004 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Massey Ferguson MF 5475 (A) is newer: production began 9 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Massey Ferguson MF 5475 (A) has 44% more hydraulic flow (33.4 L/min / 8.8 gpm) than the VALMET 8350 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The VALMET 8350 is 44% heavier (1,995 kg / 4,398 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 5475 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The VALMET 8350 has 125% more forward gears (20 gears) than the Massey Ferguson MF 5475 (A) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The Massey Ferguson MF 5475 (A) is newer: production began 9 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MF 5475 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8350 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources