Massey Ferguson MF 5475 (A) vs VALMET 8350

11 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

2007–2012

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1998–2004

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the MF 5475 (A) and the 8350 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

11 material differences · 3 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Massey Ferguson MF 5475 (A) and VALMET 8350, field by field
Field	MF 5475 (A)	8350	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	133.3 hp	133.2 hp	—
Engine declared	Perkins 1106 D-E 60 TA	VALMET 620 DSRIE	differs
Displacement declared	6.60 L	6.59 L	—
Maximum torque declared	—	471 lb·ft · 639 N·m	—
Transmission
Top speed declared	24.9 mph · 40 km/h	24.9–31.1 mph · 40–50 km/h	differs
Clutch declared	Driving clutch with 5 by 172.5 mm disc diameter	pedal-operated dry Fichtel & Sachs single-disc clutch	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Hydraulic control declared	Load sensing	—	—
Pump flow declared	29.0 gpm · 109.8 L/min	20.2 gpm · 76.4 L/min	+44% MF 5475 (A)
Pressure declared	—	3,046 psi · 210 bar	—
Three-point lift at ends declared	—	14,991 lb · 6,800 kg	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	540 rpm / 1000 rpm	540/1000 rpm	differs
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	9,910 lb · 4,495 kg	14,308 lb · 6,490 kg	+44% 8350
Maximum permissible mass declared	18,519 lb · 8,400 kg	19,842 lb · 9,000 kg	+7% 8350
Wheelbase declared	109.4 in · 2,780 mm	100.7 in · 2,558 mm	+9% MF 5475 (A)
Length declared	122.9 in · 3,122 mm	225.2 in · 5,720 mm	+83% 8350
Width declared	78.4 in · 1,991 mm	84.8 in · 2,155 mm	+8% 8350
Height declared	111.0 in · 2,820 mm	111.2 in · 2,825 mm	—
Ground clearance declared	15.4 in · 390 mm	18.1 in · 460 mm	+18% 8350
Fuel tank declared	—	174.4 qt · 165.0 L	—

Source

Source