Massey Ferguson MF 5475 (A) or Massey Ferguson MF 7475?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the MF 5475 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 7475 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Massey Ferguson MF 7475 suits road haulage better on this data: 13% (1,100 kg / 2,425 lb) more maximum permissible mass.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Massey Ferguson MF 5475 (A) and Massey Ferguson MF 7475, with the call on each
QuestionMF 5475 (A)MF 7475Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?99.4 kW (133.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 5475”99.4 kW (133.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 7475”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MF 5475 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 7475 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the MF 5475 (A) and the MF 7475.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the MF 5475 (A) and the MF 7475.
Which pumps more oil for implements?109.8 L/min (29.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 5475”119.9 L/min (31.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 7475”EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the MF 5475 (A) and the MF 7475.
Which is heavier, for traction?4,495 kg (9,910 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 5475”6,250 kg (13,779 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 7475”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Massey Ferguson MF 7475 is 39% heavier (1,755 kg / 3,869 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 5475 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?8,400 kg (18,519 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 5475”9,500 kg (20,944 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 7475”AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 7475 has 13% higher maximum permissible mass (1,100 kg / 2,425 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 5475 (A) (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
Which has the wider choice of gears?16 forwardTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 5475”Stepless (CVT)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 7475”DifferTransmissions differ in kind: the Massey Ferguson MF 5475 (A) has 16 forward gears and the Massey Ferguson MF 7475 is stepless (CVT) — not called.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MF 5475 (A) and the MF 7475.
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 5475”40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 7475”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 5475”540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 7475”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the MF 5475 (A) and the MF 7475.
Which drives on both axles?2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 5475”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 7475”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?2007–20122004–2012EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Massey Ferguson MF 7475 is 39% heavier (1,755 kg / 3,869 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 5475 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Massey Ferguson MF 7475 has 13% higher maximum permissible mass (1,100 kg / 2,425 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 5475 (A) (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
  • Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Transmissions differ in kind: the Massey Ferguson MF 5475 (A) has 16 forward gears and the Massey Ferguson MF 7475 is stepless (CVT) — not called.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MF 5475 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 7475 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources