Massey Ferguson MF 5455 (A) or Massey Ferguson MF 6455 (A)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the MF 5455 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 6455 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Massey Ferguson MF 6455 (A) suits road haulage better on this data: 11% (840 kg / 1,852 lb) more maximum permissible mass.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Massey Ferguson MF 5455 (A) and Massey Ferguson MF 6455 (A), with the call on each
QuestionMF 5455 (A)MF 6455 (A)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?73.6 kW (98.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 5455”73.6 kW (98.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6455”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MF 5455 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 6455 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the MF 5455 (A) and the MF 6455 (A).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the MF 5455 (A) and the MF 6455 (A).
Which pumps more oil for implements?57.6 L/min (15.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 5455”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the MF 6455 (A).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?4,780 kg (10,538 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 5455”4,060 kg (8,951 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6455”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the MF 5455 (A): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 5455”); the MF 6455 (A): lift through the full range at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6455”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?3,935 kg (8,675 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 5455”4,400 kg (9,700 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6455”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Massey Ferguson MF 6455 (A) is 12% heavier (465 kg / 1,025 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 5455 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?7,560 kg (16,667 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 5455”8,400 kg (18,519 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6455”AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 6455 (A) has 11% higher maximum permissible mass (840 kg / 1,852 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 5455 (A) (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
Which has the wider choice of gears?16Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 5455”24 to 32Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6455”AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 6455 (A) has 50% more forward gears (8 gears) than the Massey Ferguson MF 5455 (A) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MF 5455 (A) and the MF 6455 (A).
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 5455”40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6455”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 5455”540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6455”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the MF 5455 (A) and the MF 6455 (A).
Which drives on both axles?2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 5455”2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6455”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?2003–20132003–2013EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Massey Ferguson MF 6455 (A) is 12% heavier (465 kg / 1,025 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 5455 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Massey Ferguson MF 6455 (A) has 11% higher maximum permissible mass (840 kg / 1,852 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 5455 (A) (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
  • The Massey Ferguson MF 6455 (A) has 50% more forward gears (8 gears) than the Massey Ferguson MF 5455 (A) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MF 5455 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 6455 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the MF 5455 (A): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 5455”); the MF 6455 (A): lift through the full range at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6455”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources