Massey Ferguson MF 5435 (A) or Renault Ceres 95 (A)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the MF 5435 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Ceres 95 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Massey Ferguson 5435 (A) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 12% (529 kg / 1,165 lb) more three-point lift.
- The Massey Ferguson 5435 (A) suits road haulage better on this data: 26% (1,560 kg / 3,439 lb) more maximum permissible mass.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | MF 5435 (A) | Ceres 95 (A) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 61.1 kW (81.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 5435” | 61.1 kW (81.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ceres 95” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MF 5435 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Ceres 95 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the MF 5435 (A) and the Ceres 95 (A). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the MF 5435 (A) and the Ceres 95 (A). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | 45.3 L/min (12.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ceres 95” | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the MF 5435 (A). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 5,099 kg (11,240 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 5435” | 4,570 kg (10,075 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ceres 95” | AheadThe Massey Ferguson 5435 (A) has 12% more lift (529 kg / 1,165 lb) than the Renault Ceres 95 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,945 kg (8,697 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 5435” | 3,330 kg (7,341 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ceres 95” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Massey Ferguson 5435 (A) is 18% heavier (615 kg / 1,356 lb) than the Renault Ceres 95 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 7,560 kg (16,667 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 5435” | 6,000 kg (13,228 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ceres 95” | AheadThe Massey Ferguson 5435 (A) has 26% higher maximum permissible mass (1,560 kg / 3,439 lb) than the Renault Ceres 95 (A) (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 16Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 5435” | 18 to 20Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ceres 95” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MF 5435 (A) and the Ceres 95 (A). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 5435” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ceres 95” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 5435” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Ceres 95” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Ceres 95” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the MF 5435 (A). |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 5435” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Ceres 95” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2003–2011 | 1992–1995 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Massey Ferguson 5435 (A) is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Massey Ferguson 5435 (A) has 12% more lift (529 kg / 1,165 lb) than the Renault Ceres 95 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Massey Ferguson 5435 (A) is 18% heavier (615 kg / 1,356 lb) than the Renault Ceres 95 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Massey Ferguson 5435 (A) has 26% higher maximum permissible mass (1,560 kg / 3,439 lb) than the Renault Ceres 95 (A) (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
- The Massey Ferguson 5435 (A) is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MF 5435 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Ceres 95 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources