Massey Ferguson MF 5425 (A) vs VALMET 6200-4

9 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

2003–2011

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1996–2007

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the MF 5425 (A) and the 6200-4 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

9 material differences · 4 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Massey Ferguson MF 5425 (A) and VALMET 6200-4, field by field
Field	MF 5425 (A)	6200-4	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	74.0 hp	74.0 hp	—
Engine declared	Perkins 1104 C-44	VALMET 420 DSRE (44 DT)	differs
Displacement declared	4.40 L	4.40 L	—
Maximum torque declared	217 lb·ft · 294 N·m	—	—
Transmission
Top speed declared	24.9 mph · 40 km/h	18.6–24.9 mph · 30–40 km/h	differs
Clutch declared	pedal or electrohydraulically operated wet Valeo multi-disc clutch	—	—
Hydraulics & hitch
Hydraulic centre declared	Open centre	—	—
Pump flow declared	—	21.2 gpm · 80.3 L/min	—
Pressure declared	2,176 psi · 150 bar	—	—
Three-point lift at ends declared	11,240 lb · 5,099 kg	9,601 lb · 4,355 kg	+17% MF 5425 (A)
Rear PTO speeds declared	540 rpm / 1000 rpm	540 rpm / 1000 rpm	—
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	8,697 lb · 3,945 kg	8,929–9,193 lb · 4,050–4,170 kg	differs
Maximum permissible mass declared	16,667 lb · 7,560 kg	14,330 lb · 6,500 kg	+16% MF 5425 (A)
Wheelbase declared	97.0 in · 2,464 mm	91.6 in · 2,327 mm	+6% MF 5425 (A)
Length declared	165.7 in · 4,210 mm	177.7 in · 4,514 mm	+7% 6200-4
Width declared	79.3 in · 2,014 mm	85.9 in · 2,181 mm	+8% 6200-4
Height declared	106.5 in · 2,706 mm	106.3 in · 2,700 mm	—
Ground clearance declared	18.3 in · 464 mm	16.9 in · 430 mm	+8% MF 5425 (A)
Turning radius, braked declared	—	15.3 ft · 4.65 m	—
Fuel tank declared	—	167.0 qt · 158.0 L	—

Source

Source