Massey Ferguson MF 5410 A or Massey Ferguson MF 6235 (A)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the MF 5410 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 6235 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Massey Ferguson MF 5410 A and Massey Ferguson MF 6235 (A), with the call on each
QuestionMF 5410 AMF 6235 (A)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?55 kW (74 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 5410”55.2 kW (74.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6235”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MF 5410 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 6235 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the MF 5410 A and the MF 6235 (A).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the MF 5410 A and the MF 6235 (A).
Which pumps more oil for implements?——No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the MF 5410 A and the MF 6235 (A).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?4,300.000 kg (9,480 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 5410”4,250 kg (9,370 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6235”EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which is heavier, for traction?3,800 kg (8,378 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 5410”3,820 kg (8,422 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6235”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?8,500 kg (18,739 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 5410”8,000 kg (17,637 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6235”EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which has the wider choice of gears?16Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 5410”16 to 32Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6235”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MF 5410 A and the MF 6235 (A).
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 5410”40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6235”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 5410”540/1000/540E/1000E rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6235”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 5410”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6235”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 5410”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6235”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?2011–20141999–2003Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Massey Ferguson 5410A is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Massey Ferguson 5410A is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MF 5410 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 6235 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources