Massey Ferguson MF 4260 (A) or Renault 110-14 TS?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Renault 110-14 TS: three-point lift and maximum permissible mass.
- The Renault 110-14 TS suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 57% (2,640 kg / 5,820 lb) more three-point lift.
- The Renault 110-14 TS suits road haulage better on this data: 16% (1,100 kg / 2,425 lb) more maximum permissible mass.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | MF 4260 (A) | 110-14 TS | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 69.1 kW (92.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 4260” | 68.2 kW (91.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 110-14 TS/TX/TZ R7912” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the MF 4260 (A) and the 110-14 TS. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the MF 4260 (A) and the 110-14 TS. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | 43.4 L/min (11.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 110-14 TS/TX/TZ R7912” | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the MF 4260 (A). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 4,620 kg (10,185 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 4260” | 7,260 kg (16,006 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 110-14 TS/TX/TZ R7912” | AheadThe Renault 110-14 TS has 57% more lift (2,640 kg / 5,820 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 4260 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,730 kg (8,223 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 4260” | 5,200 kg (11,464 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 110-14 TS/TX/TZ R7912” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault 110-14 TS is 39% heavier (1,470 kg / 3,241 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 4260 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 7,000 kg (15,432 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 4260” | 8,100 kg (17,857 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 110-14 TS/TX/TZ R7912” | AheadThe Renault 110-14 TS has 16% higher maximum permissible mass (1,100 kg / 2,425 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 4260 (A) (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 4260” | 16Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 110-14 TS/TX/TZ R7912” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MF 4260 (A) and the 110-14 TS. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 4260” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 110-14 TS/TX/TZ R7912” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 4260” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 110-14 TS/TX/TZ R7912” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 110-14 TS/TX/TZ R7912” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the MF 4260 (A). |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 4260” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 110-14 TS/TX/TZ R7912” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1997–2001 | 1986–1989 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Massey Ferguson MF 4260 (A) is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Renault 110-14 TS has 57% more lift (2,640 kg / 5,820 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 4260 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Renault 110-14 TS is 39% heavier (1,470 kg / 3,241 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 4260 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Renault 110-14 TS has 16% higher maximum permissible mass (1,100 kg / 2,425 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 4260 (A) (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
- The Massey Ferguson MF 4260 (A) is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources