Massey Ferguson MF 4245 (A) or Renault 80-14 TX?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Renault 80-14 TX: three-point lift.

  • The Renault 80-14 TX suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 14% (460 kg / 1,014 lb) more three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Massey Ferguson MF 4245 (A) and Renault 80-14 TX, with the call on each
QuestionMF 4245 (A)80-14 TXCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?53.7 kW (72.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 4245”53.6 kW (71.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 80-14 TX R7762”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the MF 4245 (A) and the 80-14 TX.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the MF 4245 (A) and the 80-14 TX.
Which pumps more oil for implements?41.4 L/min (10.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 80-14 TX R7762”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the MF 4245 (A).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?3,360 kg (7,408 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 4245”3,820 kg (8,422 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 80-14 TX R7762”AheadThe Renault 80-14 TX has 14% more lift (460 kg / 1,014 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 4245 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?3,590 kg (7,915 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 4245”3,800 kg (8,378 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 80-14 TX R7762”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?7,000 kg (15,432 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 4245”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 80-14 TX.
Which has the wider choice of gears?12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 4245”8 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 80-14 TX R7762”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MF 4245 (A) and the 80-14 TX.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 4245”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 80-14 TX R7762”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 4245”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 80-14 TX R7762”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 4245”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 80-14 TX.
Which drives on both axles?2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 4245”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 80-14 TX R7762”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1997–20011984–1987Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Massey Ferguson MF 4245 (A) is newer: production began 13 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Renault 80-14 TX has 14% more lift (460 kg / 1,014 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 4245 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Massey Ferguson MF 4245 (A) is newer: production began 13 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources