Massey Ferguson MF 4215 (A) or Renault 55-12 V?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the MF 4215 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 55-12 V has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Renault 55-12V suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 67% (1,440 kg / 3,175 lb) more three-point lift.
- The Massey Ferguson 4215 (A) suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: 29% (535 kg / 1,179 lb) heavier and four-wheel drive.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | MF 4215 (A) | 55-12 V | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 38.3 kW (51.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 4215” | 38.3 kW (51.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 55-12 V R3235” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MF 4215 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 55-12 V has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the MF 4215 (A) and the 55-12 V. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the MF 4215 (A) and the 55-12 V. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | 42.2 L/min (11.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 55-12 V R3235” | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the MF 4215 (A). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,140 kg (4,718 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 4215” | 3,580 kg (7,893 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 55-12 V R3235” | AheadThe Renault 55-12V has 67% more lift (1,440 kg / 3,175 lb) than the Massey Ferguson 4215 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,385 kg (5,258 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 4215” | 1,850 kg (4,079 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 55-12 V R3235” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Massey Ferguson 4215 (A) is 29% heavier (535 kg / 1,179 lb) than the Renault 55-12V (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the MF 4215 (A) and the 55-12 V. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 4215” | 8 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 55-12 V R3235” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MF 4215 (A) and the 55-12 V. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 4215” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 55-12 V R3235” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 4215” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 55-12 V R3235” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the MF 4215 (A) and the 55-12 V. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 4215” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 55-12 V R3235” | AheadThe Massey Ferguson 4215 (A) is available with four-wheel drive; the Renault 55-12V is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1997–2001 | 1986–1999 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Massey Ferguson 4215 (A) is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Renault 55-12V has 67% more lift (1,440 kg / 3,175 lb) than the Massey Ferguson 4215 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Massey Ferguson 4215 (A) is 29% heavier (535 kg / 1,179 lb) than the Renault 55-12V (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Massey Ferguson 4215 (A) is available with four-wheel drive; the Renault 55-12V is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- The Massey Ferguson 4215 (A) is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MF 4215 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 55-12 V has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources