Leyland 344 or SOMECA 540 (TD)?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Leyland 344: hydraulic flow. On features, the SOMECA 540 (TD) is ahead on drive.

  • The Leyland 344 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 42% (9.2 L/min / 2.4 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Leyland 344 and SOMECA 540 (TD), with the call on each
Question344540 (TD)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?33.5 kW (45.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Leyland 344”33.3 kW (44.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 540”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 344 and the 540 (TD).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 344 and the 540 (TD).
Which pumps more oil for implements?31.0 L/min (8.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Leyland 344”21.8 L/min (5.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 540”AheadThe Leyland 344 has 42% more hydraulic flow (9.2 L/min / 2.4 gpm) than the SOMECA 540 (TD) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,520 kg (3,351 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Leyland 344”1,620 kg (3,571 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 540”EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,125 kg (4,685 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Leyland 344”1,865 kg (4,112 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 540”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Leyland 344 is 14% heavier (260 kg / 573 lb) than the SOMECA 540 (TD) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?——No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 344 and the 540 (TD).
Which has the wider choice of gears?10Traktorenlexikon, “Leyland 344”8 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 540”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 344 and the 540 (TD).
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Leyland 344”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 540”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Leyland 344”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Someca 540”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Leyland 344”—No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 540 (TD).
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Leyland 344”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Someca 540”AheadThe SOMECA 540 (TD) is available with four-wheel drive; the Leyland 344 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1969–19721973–1982EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Leyland 344 has 42% more hydraulic flow (9.2 L/min / 2.4 gpm) than the SOMECA 540 (TD) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Leyland 344 is 14% heavier (260 kg / 573 lb) than the SOMECA 540 (TD) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The SOMECA 540 (TD) is available with four-wheel drive; the Leyland 344 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources